And please, do not split my comments in the future. User:Kjr99044 03:00:51 This is very bad criteria - I'm quite sure that at least 50% of image viewers here are virtually unknown and use Wikipedia for promotion of their software (which is against Wikipedia rules). If someone felt strongly enough about a viewer to add it, then it should probably remain there until it is no longer supported or usable (In other words, if someone tests and shows that it no longer works on any modern platforms from the last 10 years). Futurix 10:11, 4 October 2006 (UTC) Reply The purpose of this article probably isn't to determine which viewers are popular, and we open a can of worms if we try. Should all image viewers of all times be listed in the articles or those at least with some popularity?Ĭheck: CocoViewX, CPC View, Elgorithms MagicTracer, ExifPro Image Viewer, EyeBrowse, F-Spot, GQView, GraphicConverter, Gwenview, Image Browser Arctic, IMatch, imgSeek, P3dO, Shell Picture, ShowImg, Vallen JPegger, VeriPic, ViewIt - all are virtually unknown. Or should applications that can edit images also be removed, because they are image editors not image viewers? - Peter 15:57, 24 February 2006 (UTC) Reply Most applications provide both image viewing and image organizing features. I don't think you can talk about any difference between the two application types. Surely storing information in a central database is something for an image organizer? Acdsee does this too. The amount of file formats supported? Both Acdsee and ThumbsPlus support around 100 file formats. Acdsee, for example, is called a photo manager by it's publisher. Almost all applications mentioned do more than viewing single or lists of files.
At least in a way that specifies the applications in this list as being mere viewers. Again, two different things.- Ctachme 15:39, 26 August 2005 (UTC) Reply Please explain the (huge) difference between an image organizer and an image viewer. The problem here is apparently the same as over at comparison of media players that treats a orgianzier the same as a player.
However, since image organisers need to rapidly scroll through thousands of images, often, their support of image formats is not as through as image viewers. Image organisers organise your files and image viewers do nothing but view single or lists of images.
There is a huge difference between the two. I know of at least 2 programs that are image organisers, not image viewers.
0 kommentar(er)
